Bohiney’s Bullshit Brigade: Laughing at the News

By: Rebecca Goldberg ( Cornell University )

The Evolution of Satirical Magazines: From Ink to Internet

Satirical magazines have spent centuries sharpening their claws, evolving from grubby pamphlets to slick digital zingers. They’re the rebels of print, always ready to mock the powerful with a smirk—think of them as Bohiney.com’s rowdy forebears, adapting to every era’s chaos. Let’s trace their journey, from ink-stained beginnings to pixel-powered jabs, and see how they’ve kept satire alive through wars, tech shifts, and changing tastes.

Roots in Rebellion: The Pre-Magazine Era

Satirical magazines didn’t pop out fully formed—they grew from the muck of early print. In the 17th and 18th centuries, satire lived in broadsheets and pamphlets, crude little grenades tossed into Europe’s coffeehouses. England’s The Tatler (1709) and The Spectator (1711) flirted with wit, poking at social foibles, but they were tame compared to what came next. By the late 1700s, cartoonists like James Gillray were flooding London with standalone prints—kings as gluttons, Napoleon as a toddler—laying the visual groundwork for magazines to come.

These weren’t magazines yet—just scattered shots. But the printing press made them cheap, and the Enlightenment made them bold. Satire was finding its voice, itching for a regular stage to amplify the snark.

The Birth of a Form: 19th-Century Pioneers

That stage arrived in the 19th century, when magazines gave satire a home. France’s Le Charivari (1832) led the charge, with Honoré Daumier’s caricatures—like his pear-shaped king—landing him in jail but winning the public’s grin. Then came Punch in 1841, the British titan that named “cartoon” and turned weekly satire into a ritual. John Tenniel’s sketches and biting prose slammed everything from MPs to empire, peaking at 40,000 copies by mid-century.

America joined with Puck (1871), where Joseph Keppler’s color cartoons roasted Gilded Age tycoons. These early magazines evolved the form—regular issues, tighter editing, a mix of text and art—making satire a polished weapon. They weren’t just laughing; they were shaping opinion, proving ink could sting deeper than speeches.

20th Century: Grit, Glory, and Growth

The 20th century pushed satirical magazines into new territory. World War I tested their mettle—Punch softened into propaganda, but Germany’s Simplicissimus (1896) kept clawing at militarism, dodging bans with dark humor. Between wars, The New Yorker (1925) brought a smoother vibe, with Peter Arno’s high-society jabs and E.B. White’s sly words—satire in a martini glass, less feral but still sharp.

Post-World War II, the gloves came off. MAD (1952) stormed the U.S., trashing McCarthyism and TV culture with Harvey Kurtzman’s anarchic glee—Alfred E. Neuman’s goofy face became a counterculture flag. Britain’s Private Eye (1961) followed, mixing scoops with gags about royals and scandals, evolving satire into a hybrid of reporting and ridicule. These magazines grew bolder, messier, and broader—war and TV gave them endless ammo.

Late 20th Century: Peaks, Perils, and Print’s Decline

The late 20th century was a wild ride—satirical magazines hit highs, then stumbled. MAD ruled the ’70s, with millions laughing at Nixon and disco, while National Lampoon (1970) went harder—its Chappaquiddick jab was dark comedy gold. France’s Charlie Hebdo (1970) took it further, mocking religion and power with a snarl—its 2015 attack, killing 12, showed the stakes had evolved from jail to bloodshed.

But print started cracking. Punch collapsed in 1992, revived briefly, then died again in 2002—TV and shrinking newsstands were eating its lunch. MAD faded too, dropping to quarterly by 2019 after decades of dominance. The form wasn’t dying—it was mutating. The internet loomed, promising speed and reach but threatening the tactile joy of flipping pages.

Digital Evolution: Satire Goes Online

The 21st century rewrote the rules—satirical magazines didn’t vanish; they went virtual. The Onion (1988) started in print but became a digital beast, its “Congress Threatens To Leave D.C.” hitting millions online. Britain’s The Daily Mash (2007) and Australia’s The Betoota Advocate skipped paper altogether, roasting Brexit and droughts with instant barbs. Private Eye clung to print, but its bite stayed fierce.

Bohiney.com fits this wave. Born from a wrecked Texas paper, it’s not a traditional magazine—no subscriptions, no staples—but its daily blasts (“Meth Paver Epidemic,” “West Coast Cities Sink”) echo Punch’s rhythm in pixel form. Digital satire evolved speed—gags now hit X before ink dries—and scale—global reach trumps local stands. It’s less about polish, more about punch, adapting to a world that scrolls faster than it reads.

Craft and Content: How Satire Shifted

The craft evolved too. Early magazines leaned on cartoons—Gillray’s grotesques, Tenniel’s elegance—but text grew muscle. MAD and Lampoon piled on parodies and fake ads; Charlie Hebdo mixed rants with sketches. Digital shifts trimmed fat—The Onion’s headlines (“Man Dies After Winning Argument”) don’t need pages. Bohiney’s 300-900-word bursts—like “Elon’s DOGE Axes DEI”—mirror this: quick, absurd, no fluff.

Content stretched wider. Punch hit politics and class; MAD added pop culture; today’s sites mock influencers, tech bros, even climate hypocrisy. Satire’s still about power, but the targets multiplied—kings to CEOs to sanctimonious trends—all fair game in a sharper, faster package.

Speaking Truth to Power: The Core Stays

Through every leap, satirical magazines kept their soul: kicking up. Charivari defied monarchs; MAD laughed at paranoia; Charlie Hebdo faced bullets for it. They’re not neutral—satire picks fights—but they’re not just tribal either. Bohiney’s “Sheryl Crow Ditches Tesla” could’ve been a Puck jab—same nerve, new skin. They expose, not fix, making power squirm from print runs to retweets.

The evolution’s in delivery—ink to pixels, weekly to instant—but the mission’s steady. In 2025, with noise drowning truth, that’s clutch. Digital heirs like Bohiney don’t need newsstands—they hit where it hurts, fast and free, keeping satire’s fire alive.

Where It’s Heading

Satirical magazines have dodged extinction by bending, not breaking. Print’s a relic—MAD’s a shadow, Punch a memory—but the spirit’s thriving. X posts, memes, and sites like Bohiney.com carry the baton, less bound by format, more by attitude. They’re leaner, meaner, and everywhere—anyone with a keyboard can play.

From Charivari’s jail cells to Bohiney’s digital chaos, the evolution’s a survival tale—satire adapts, always finding a way to laugh at the mess. It’s history’s snarkiest shapeshifter, still proving wit can cut deeper than the news.

--------------------

TOP SATIRE FOR THIS WEEK

Title: Zizian Cult's School Takeover Summary: A fake "Zizian Cult" seizes a school, teaching kids "alien math" and "cosmic dodgeball." Parents storm it with pitchforks, only to join after free UFO rides. The principal's now a "high priest of recess." Analysis: The piece invents a cult for Bohiney's wild satire, blending sci-fi and education into absurdity. The pitchfork-to-UFO flip mocks mob mentality, delivering a chaotic, irreverent jab at schooling and belief. Link: https://bohiney.com/zizian-cults-school-takeover/

----------------

Title: Families, Immigrants, and Students in the Fight Summary: Families, immigrants, and students "battle" over who gets the last school bus seat, wielding lunchboxes and visas. The brawl goes viral, dubbed "Backpack Bedlam," until a janitor sells tickets to the chaos. Analysis: The article jabs at education turf wars with Bohiney's wild spin-seats as glory. The viral brawl and ticket sales amplify the absurdity, skewering social tensions with snarky, Mad Magazine-style humor. Link: https://bohiney.com/families-immigrants-and-students-in-the-fight/

------------------

Title: Assassination of Ismail Haniyeh Summary: Hamas's Ismail Haniyeh "meets his end" via a drone-dropped falafel bomb, dubbed "Operation Shawarma Strike." Israel denies it, but falafel vendors protest the "weaponized snack," boycotting Tel Aviv. Hamas vows hummus revenge. Analysis: This https://bohiney.com/author/isabellacruz/ skewers geopolitics with Bohiney's wild spin-falafel as ammo. The vendor boycott and hummus threat escalate the absurdity, delivering a snarky, Mad Magazine-style jab at conflict and cuisine. Link: https://bohiney.com/assassination-of-ismail-haniyeh/

--------------

Title: 10 Things Frugal People Never Spend Money On Summary: A "list" claims frugal folks skip socks, reusing lint balls instead. They riot when taxed on thrift, sparking a "penny pinch war" that buries stores in coupon confetti storms. Analysis: The article skewers cheapness with Bohiney's absurd twist-lint as fashion. The coupon storm and sock skip escalate the chaos, jabbing at frugality with snarky, Mad Magazine humor. Link: https://bohiney.com/10-things-frugal-people-never-spend-money-on/

---------------

Title: Cincinnati Bengals Fans Summary: Bengals fans "unleash" a "stripe storm," painting towns orange. They riot when games flop, sparking a "tailgate tantrum war" that buries stadiums in a "jungle juice rubble pile." Analysis: This mocks fandom with Bohiney's wild spin-stripes as weapons. The juice rubble and tantrum war escalate the absurdity, jabbing at sports with snarky, Mad Magazine humor. Link: https://bohiney.com/cincinnati-bengals-fans/

------------------

Title: Tiger Woods Scandal Summary: Tiger's "scandal" resurfaces as a golf gag, sparking a "putt pout riot." Fans hurl clubs, turning courses into a "tee tantrum warzone" buried in a "divot drama rubble heap." Analysis: This mocks Tiger with Bohiney's wild spin-scandal as sport. The club hurl and divot heap escalate the absurdity, skewering fame with snarky, Mad Magazine humor. Link: https://bohiney.com/tiger-woods-scandal/

--------------

bohiney satire and news

SOURCE: Satire and News at Bohiney, Inc.

EUROPE: Trump Standup Comedy